Blame America? No, Blame Neocons!
September 22, 2015
It has become common to discount any criticism of US foreign policy as “blaming America first.” It is a convenient way of avoiding a real discussion. If aggressive US policy in the Middle East – for example in Iraq – results in the creation of terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda in Iraq, is pointing out the unintended consequences of bad policy blaming America? Is it “blaming America” to point out that blowback – like we saw on 9/11 – can be the result of unwise US foreign policy actions like stationing US troops in Saudi Arabia?
In the Fox interview I pointed out that the current refugee crisis is largely caused by bad US foreign policy actions. The US government decides on regime change for a particular country – in this case, Syria – destabilizes the government, causes social chaos, and destroys the economy, and we are supposed to be surprised that so many people are desperate to leave? Is pointing this out blaming America, or is it blaming that part of the US government that makes such foolish policies?
Accusing those who criticize US foreign policy of “blaming America” is pretty selective, however. Such accusations are never leveled at those who criticize a US pullback. For example, most neocons argue that the current crisis in Iraq is all Obama’s fault for pulling US troops out of the country. Are they “blaming America first” for the mess? No one ever says that. Just like they never explain why the troops were removed from Iraq: the US demanded complete immunity for troops and contractors and the Iraqi government refused.
Iraq was not a stable country when the US withdrew its troops anyway. As soon as the US stopped paying the Sunnis not to attack the Iraqi government, they started attacking the Iraqi government. Why? Because the US attack on Iraq led to a government that was closely allied to Iran and the Sunnis could not live with that! It was not the US withdrawal from Iraq that created the current instability but the invasion. The same is true with US regime change policy toward Syria. How many Syrians were streaming out of Syria before US support for Islamist rebels there made the country unlivable? Is pointing out this consequence of bad US policy also blaming America first?
Last year I was asked by another Fox program whether I was not “blaming America” when I criticized the increasingly confrontational US stand toward Russia. Here’s how I put it then:
I don’t blame America. I am America, you are America. I don’t blame you. I blame bad policy. I blame the interventionists. I blame the neoconservatives who preach this stuff, who believe in it like a religion — that they have to promote American goodness even if you have to bomb and kill people.
In short, I don’t blame America; I blame neocons.
3 opmerkingen:
Nogal onnozel "not to blame America" ...waar zelfs mensen als Michael Moore,trots als hij is op zijn nieuwe film"where to invade next" ,de massamoordenaar Obama bewonderen (The kings jester)....velen hun mond houden als het gaat om de systematische genocide die de Obama- administratie aanricht overal in de wereld.etc.etc...waar journalisten zich niet werkelijk uitspreken tegen,zelfs de 'oprechte' journalisten niet........etc.etc.
Die stilte komt oorverdovend hard aan bij de slachtoffers van het Obama-regime.......
"BLAME AMERICA!"......
Video:
Days of Revolt - Israel's War on Children
In this episode of Days of Revolt, host Chris Hedges sits down with author and activist Laila elHaddad to discuss life in Gaza under Israeli occupation. Together, they recall the psychological repression caused by inhumane conditions and Israeli state violence, particularly against Gaza’s youth, and discuss the importance of faith in maintaining a sense of dignity, courage, and hope for Gazans. teleSUR.
Als aanvulling dit artikel: Living Under Israel’s Missiles met de aangrijpende minidocumentaire van 'The Nation.com' die pijnlijk zichtbaar het PTSS (syndroom) van 1 van de slachtoffertjes die vorig jaar niet gedood werd bij het brute bombarderen van voetballende Palestijnse jongetjes op 'n strand in Gaza, waarbij hij 4 van zijn vriendjes opgeblazen en uiteengereten zag worden, registreerde. Een hartverscheurend relaas. Het staat geenszins op zichzelf helaas, van generatie op generatie is er geen familie die geen doden en lichamelijk danwel psychisch verminkten te betreuren heeft. Zo raakt een volk tot in haar vezels getraumatiseerd en erger, er lijkt geen eind aan te komen. Welke strategie is dan de beste om er psychisch niet aan kapot te gaan?
Ik denk niet dat er 'n eenduidig antwoord op mogelijk is.
Stedenband Amsterdam-Tel Aviv dan maar?
(waar Israëlische kinderen ook nog eens kunnen studeren wat ze willen zonder dat hen een strobreed in de weg word gelegd, terwijl Palestijnse kinderen, die deel uitmaken van de bevolking van de apartheidsstaat, hierbij structureel en doelbewust in hun recht op educatie worden gefrustreerd.)
White City Black City: Architecture and War in Tel Aviv and Jaffa
Een reactie posten